I see the village
community as a functional structure which strengthens the possibility
for families to be prosperous in a self-reliant way. In that sense,
the community is for the family. The family is a functional structure
which strengthens the possibility for each person to discover what is
right living, in the warmth of relationship. In that sense, the
family is for the person.
In this way, the
functional order is in favour of each person being free and finding
fulfilment. This is the purpose of society; the combined expression
of a people is to serve the person so he can understand life and be
complete. With this functional purpose, a village community unfolds a
structure which strengthens the possibility for each person to grow
and flower in a fertile social soil.
Whether such a
dispensation, in its completeness, has been achieved, I do not know.
But it is certainly true that in India, traditionally, we have had
largely self-sufficient village communities which together
constituted society. They had come up organically and had been
maintained with some diligence. And now, for the last two hundred
years or so, the force of modern society has been breaking them
apart, first slowly, but now with great speed.
Living in rural
Garhwal for the last four years, I see that the village community
being dismantled today are only the structural remains; it appears
that the functional purpose has been long lost, if at all it was ever
fully realised. The structure has continued a while longer as a
momentum of habit - so what we see crumbling today may not be
tradition per se, but the inertia of tradition. Even so, I am of the
view that a good thing is being pulled down, and I would say we ought
to question why we are doing this.